Eight US States Sue OpenAI Over Alleged ChatGPT Safety Failures
A group of eight states filed separate lawsuits accusing OpenAI of prioritizing profits over child safety and misleading users about risks.

Key points
- Iowa, Kansas, Nebraska, West Virginia, Arkansas, Arizona, Idaho, and Montana filed separate complaints against OpenAI.
- The suits allege the company violated consumer protection laws by failing to warn users about ChatGPT dangers.
- Plaintiffs claim the chatbot poses risks to minors and vulnerable adults, citing previous legal cases involving deaths.
Eight United States states filed separate lawsuits against OpenAI, accusing the artificial intelligence developer of endangering children and misleading the public regarding the safety of its ChatGPT service. The legal actions were initiated by Iowa, Kansas, Nebraska, West Virginia, Arkansas, Arizona, Idaho, and Montana, marking a significant escalation in regulatory scrutiny of AI safety protocols.
According to The Verge, these complaints allege that OpenAI unlawfully prioritized financial gain over user safety during the development of its chatbot. The states claim the company violated local consumer protection statutes by failing to adequately warn customers about potential harms. This legal wave follows earlier reporting by Reuters and aligns with a separate lawsuit filed in Hawaii, as Threat Times reported on October 15, 2026.
Allegations of Harm and Misrepresentation
The state complaints argue that OpenAI presented ChatGPT as a safe, youth-appropriate tool while ignoring serious risks to vulnerable users. Plaintiffs assert the technology degrades critical thinking skills, encourages paranoia and delusions, and offers dangerous medical advice. The lawsuits reference prior legal actions filed by family members of teens and adults who died, alleging the AI played a role in their deaths.
Arizona’s lawsuit specifically claims OpenAI has devolved from a public-first nonprofit into a cautionary tale driven by a profit-at-all-costs mindset. The states argue this approach sidelines essential safeguards, creating an unacceptable risk for users who rely on the system for information and interaction.
Data Collection and Regulatory Response
The litigations also accuse OpenAI of collecting data from minors without sufficient parental consent and failing to prevent underage access. The states cite recent rogue AI hacking incidents as evidence of the company’s alleged recklessness in managing its platform. They are seeking civil penalties and court orders to stop OpenAI from misleading the public about the chatbot’s safety features.
In response, OpenAI spokesperson Drew Pusateri stated the company has built industry-leading age-specific protections into ChatGPT. He emphasized that while no system is perfect, the firm continues to work with experts to develop additional safeguards, including parental controls and break reminders. OpenAI also expressed a commitment to working with states on pragmatic AI policies that apply to the entire industry, not just one company.
What should you do?
Security and technology professionals should monitor these legal developments for potential impacts on AI deployment policies within their organizations. Organizations using generative AI tools should review their current usage guidelines and ensure they align with emerging regulatory expectations regarding user safety and data privacy. It is advisable to document all interactions with AI systems and maintain robust oversight mechanisms for vulnerable user groups.
Background: Generative AI
Generative AI examples include text completion, image synthesis and code generation. These systems predict the next likely token based on vast training datasets. Understanding the underlying mechanics helps you identify risks like data leakage and hallucination in your infrastructure.
Read the full guide: Generative AI Examples: Mechanisms, Risks and Control
What to do and how to stay safe: OpenAI
- Review internal policies regarding the use of generative AI tools, especially for employees or users under the age of majority.
- Implement additional monitoring or filtering layers for AI interactions to mitigate risks associated with harmful or misleading outputs.
- Educate users about the limitations of AI systems and the importance of verifying information obtained from chatbots.
- Stay informed about evolving state and federal regulations concerning AI safety and consumer protection laws.
Step-by-step guide: Prompt Injection Warning Signs: How to Spot AI Manipulation
General security guidance from the Threat Times newsroom. It is not confirmed advice from the organisations named in this story.
Frequently asked questions
Which states are suing OpenAI?
Iowa, Kansas, Nebraska, West Virginia, Arkansas, Arizona, Idaho, and Montana filed separate lawsuits against OpenAI.
What are the main allegations in the lawsuits?
The states allege OpenAI prioritized profits over safety, misled users about ChatGPT’s safety, and failed to protect minors from harmful content.
How did OpenAI respond to the lawsuits?
OpenAI stated it has built industry-leading age-specific protections and is committed to working with states on broader AI safety policies.


