Hebrew University researchers estimate superconducting memory bit near physics limit
Physicists report a single vortex acts as a memory bit at five times Landauer's limit, though extreme cooling offsets energy savings.

Key points
- Hebrew University physicists estimate a superconducting vortex memory bit operates at roughly five times Landauer's limit.
- The device functions only at 4.2 kelvin, requiring liquid-helium temperatures that consume significant energy.
- Published in Nature Communications, the study faced opposition from one of its three peer reviewers.
Physicists at the Hebrew University of Jerusalem estimate that a single superconducting vortex can function as a memory bit at approximately five times the theoretical minimum energy limit defined by physics. This finding, published in Nature Communications on September 24, suggests a new approach to ultra-low-energy computing, though it relies on extreme cold.
The research team, led by Yonathan Anahory, determined this efficiency figure through simulation-based estimates anchored to continuous-drive measurements rather than direct bit erasure tests. The university publicized the results in a release on October 11, noting that the device brings energy consumption remarkably close to the physical floor, despite the practical limitations of the experimental setup.
Context and Background
Every time a computer erases a bit, it incurs an energy cost that physics mandates, a principle established by IBM physicist Rolf Landauer in 1961. Landauer’s limit, calculated as kT ln 2, scales with temperature and equals about 2.9 zeptojoules at room temperature. No existing commercial chip approaches this efficiency, making the gap between current technology and the physical limit a major focus for reducing computing electricity bills.
The Hebrew University team used a 55-nanometer niobium film patterned into a strip 10 micrometers wide, cooled to 4.2 kelvin. In this thin superconducting film, magnetic fields penetrate as tiny tubes of circulating current, known as vortices, which carry one quantum of flux. These vortices snag on defects in the material, allowing researchers to manipulate their positions for data storage.
By sweeping a steady current through the strip, the researchers nudged individual vortices into spots where the film’s natural disorder provided two neighboring resting places just a few nanometers apart. This positioning acts as a binary store, with left or right positions representing zero or one. The team then rocked each vortex with an alternating current and tracked its motion using a SQUID-on-tip microscope, a magnetic sensor built onto a tapered glass probe.
The lag in the vortex’s motion revealed the energy lost each cycle. Anahory stated that the result places the bit at roughly five times Landauer's limit. However, the university release explicitly covers the energy measured for the actual test, excluding the cooling aspect. Critics note that refrigeration costs could significantly reduce the claimed efficiency advantage over conventional computers.
Who Is Affected
The findings primarily impact researchers in condensed matter physics and quantum computing who are exploring alternative memory architectures. One of the paper's three peer reviewers opposed the final version, indicating ongoing scientific debate about the validity or interpretation of the results. The technology is not currently viable for commercial use due to its requirement for liquid-helium temperatures, which are impractical for general-purpose computing environments.
The claim of a million-fold energy edge over conventional chips, mentioned in the university release, disregards the substantial energy required to maintain the 4.2 kelvin operating temperature. For industry professionals tracking low-power computing trends, this research highlights the thermodynamic barriers to achieving Landauer-limited computing without prohibitive cooling overhead.
What should you do?
Researchers and engineers interested in ultra-low-power memory should monitor follow-up studies that address the cooling energy penalty. The scientific community should await further peer review and replication efforts to validate the fivefold efficiency estimate. Technologists should view this as a fundamental physics demonstration rather than a near-term product roadmap.
What to do and how to stay safe: Hebrew University
- Review the full Nature Communications article to understand the simulation-based methodology and peer review context.
- Assess the total energy cost of cryogenic cooling when evaluating the practical efficiency of superconducting memory concepts.
- Monitor for follow-up research that attempts to operate similar vortex-based bits at higher temperatures.
- Compare these findings with other emerging memory technologies to gauge their relative viability for future low-power applications.
Step-by-step guide: Mobile Device Security: How to Protect Data Beyond Passwords
General security guidance from the Threat Times newsroom. It is not confirmed advice from the organisations named in this story.
Frequently asked questions
What is Landauer's limit?
Landauer's limit is the theoretical minimum energy required to erase a bit of information, defined as kT ln 2, which equals about 2.9 zeptojoules at room temperature.
Does this new memory technology work at room temperature?
No, the device works only at 4.2 kelvin, which is a liquid-helium temperature, requiring significant refrigeration that offsets energy savings.
Is this a measured erasure of a bit?
No, the fivefold figure is a simulation-based estimate anchored to continuous-drive measurements, not a direct measurement of bit erasure.


