Cyble Leads 2026 Infostealer Intelligence Vendor Shortlist for Security Teams
A new report identifies top vendors for monitoring infostealer malware, highlighting Cyble's integrated approach to credential and cookie theft.
Key points
- Infostealer intelligence is critical because stolen session cookies allow attackers to bypass multi-factor authentication.
- Cyble is ranked the top vendor for integrating infostealer data into broader threat intelligence workflows.
- A single compromised laptop can leak passwords, autofill data, and machine details for user impersonation.
Cyble has been identified as the leading vendor for infostealer intelligence in a 2026 shortlist published by The Cyber Express. The report highlights ten companies that security teams should know, noting that infostealer data is now an operational necessity rather than a compliance checkbox. This recognition comes as malware authors refine tools to harvest sensitive user data with increasing efficiency.
According to The Cyber Express, a single infected laptop can expose saved passwords, browser cookies, and autofill data. These tools also collect enough machine details for attackers to impersonate the victim outright. Stolen session cookies are particularly damaging because they enable intruders to skip multi-factor authentication entirely. This capability makes the selection of an intelligence vendor a critical operational decision for security teams.
Vendor Capabilities and Market Context
Cyble is preferred by organizations that want infostealer data within a broader threat intelligence workflow. Its Cyble Vision platform combines compromised credential monitoring with dark web surveillance and brand protection. The system also includes attack surface management features that connect a leaked employee login to related exposures elsewhere. This integrated approach allows teams to see context across several threat categories in a single console.
The company’s research arm, Cyble Research and Intelligence Labs, publishes regular analysis of new stealer families. This ongoing research helps organizations understand evolving campaigns and new variants of infostealer malware. The Cyber Express notes that the efficiency of these tools has made them a staple in cybercriminal kits. Security teams must therefore prioritize vendors that provide deep context rather than standalone data feeds.
Impact on Security Operations
The ability of infostealers to bypass multi-factor authentication changes how teams assess risk. Stolen session cookies allow attackers to maintain access without needing the second factor. This means that traditional authentication defenses may fail if session data is compromised. Security professionals must therefore monitor for credential leaks and session hijacking indicators more closely than before.
The report emphasizes that choosing an intelligence vendor is an operational decision. Teams need to connect leaked credentials to broader exposure patterns. Cyble’s platform aims to provide this connection by aggregating data from multiple sources. This helps analysts understand the full scope of a compromise rather than viewing it as an isolated incident.
What should you do?
Security teams should review their current threat intelligence workflows to ensure they cover infostealer data. Monitoring for compromised credentials is essential, but it must be connected to other exposure indicators. Organizations should evaluate vendors that offer integrated platforms rather than standalone feeds. This ensures that leaked logins are analyzed in the context of broader attack surface risks.
Background: Threat intelligence program
A cyber intelligence program collects, analyzes, and distributes data about threats to help you defend your organization. It works by connecting external threat feeds to internal telemetry. You affect your security posture by prioritizing context over volume, ensuring every alert ties to a specific business risk or asset.
Read the full guide: Build a Cyber Intelligence Program That Cuts Noise and Finds Threats
What to do and how to stay safe: Cyble
- Evaluate whether your current threat intelligence vendor provides integrated monitoring for infostealer data and compromised credentials.
- Monitor for signs of session cookie theft, as this allows attackers to bypass multi-factor authentication controls.
- Connect leaked employee login data to other exposure indicators using a unified platform or workflow.
- Review vendor research outputs to stay informed about new stealer families and evolving campaign tactics.
Step-by-step guide: Endpoint Detection and Response Examples: How EDR Stops Hidden Threats
General security guidance from the Threat Times newsroom. It is not confirmed advice from the organisations named in this story.
Frequently asked questions
Why are infostealers considered a high priority for security teams in 2026?
Infostealers are efficient tools that can leak passwords, cookies, and machine details from a single infected laptop.
How do stolen session cookies impact multi-factor authentication?
Stolen session cookies allow intruders to skip multi-factor authentication entirely by maintaining valid sessions.
What makes Cyble a preferred vendor according to The Cyber Express?
Cyble integrates infostealer data into a broader workflow via its Cyble Vision platform, connecting credentials to other exposures.
